Legislature(2011 - 2012)
2012-04-09 House Journal
Full Journal pdf2012-04-09 House Journal Page 2284 HB 347 The following, which was advanced to third reading from the April 6, 2012, calendar (page 2245), was read the third time: CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 347(JUD) am "An Act prohibiting the use of municipal funds to support or oppose an initiative proposal filed with the lieutenant governor or to circulate a petition for a statewide ballot initiative without approval by municipal voters at an election; relating to the reporting of certain expenditures; and providing for an effective date." Representative Kerttula moved and asked unanimous consent that CSHB 347(JUD) am be returned to second reading for the specific purpose of considering Amendment No. 2. There was objection. The question being: "Shall CSHB 347(JUD) am be returned to second reading for the specific purpose of considering Amendment No. 2?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 347(JUD) am Third Reading Return to Second for Amendment No. 2 YEAS: 12 NAYS: 26 EXCUSED: 1 ABSENT: 1 2012-04-09 House Journal Page 2285 Yeas: Cissna, Doogan, Gara, Gardner, Gruenberg, Holmes, Kawasaki, Kerttula, Miller, Petersen, Seaton, Tuck Nays: Austerman, Chenault, Costello, Dick, Edgmon, Fairclough, Feige, Foster, Hawker, Herron, Johansen, Johnson, Joule, Keller, Lynn, Millett, Munoz, Neuman, Olson, Pruitt, Saddler, Stoltze, Thomas, Thompson, P.Wilson, T.Wilson Excused: Gatto Absent: Guttenberg And so, the motion failed. The question being: "Shall CSHB 347(JUD) am pass the House?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 347(JUD) am Third Reading Final Passage YEAS: 22 NAYS: 17 EXCUSED: 1 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Chenault, Costello, Dick, Fairclough, Feige, Foster, Hawker, Holmes, Johansen, Johnson, Keller, Lynn, Millett, Munoz, Neuman, Olson, Pruitt, Saddler, Stoltze, Thomas, Thompson, T.Wilson Nays: Austerman, Cissna, Doogan, Edgmon, Gara, Gardner, Gruenberg, Guttenberg, Herron, Joule, Kawasaki, Kerttula, Miller, Petersen, Seaton, Tuck, P.Wilson Excused: Gatto And so, CSHB 347(JUD) am passed the House. Representative Austerman moved the effective date clause. The question being: "Shall the effective date clause be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 347(JUD) am Third Reading Effective Date YEAS: 30 NAYS: 9 EXCUSED: 1 ABSENT: 0 2012-04-09 House Journal Page 2286 Yeas: Austerman, Chenault, Costello, Dick, Doogan, Edgmon, Fairclough, Feige, Foster, Gruenberg, Hawker, Herron, Holmes, Johansen, Johnson, Joule, Keller, Lynn, Millett, Munoz, Neuman, Olson, Pruitt, Saddler, Seaton, Stoltze, Thomas, Thompson, P.Wilson, T.Wilson Nays: Cissna, Gara, Gardner, Guttenberg, Kawasaki, Kerttula, Miller, Petersen, Tuck Excused: Gatto And so, the effective date clause was adopted. Representative Kerttula gave notice of reconsideration of the vote on CSHB 347(JUD) am.